Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina)[edit]

First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of notability. Just a local church. Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immanuel Lutheran Church (Hodgkins, Illinois). —DIYeditor (talk) 06:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The News & Record article Madison church celebrates 170 years article is a WP:RS, and the point is that it includes material from which article can be improved, and keywords that will enable keyword searches to find additional sources. Like most of our pages, this article about an old and notable church needs a willing editor to improve it. note that the 19th century church was razed and replaced in the 1950s, but that while the present church is not architecturally interesting, material on the old building exists.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:24, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.