Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FirstTake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

FirstTake

NN podcast. Google search reveals this; [1] but I can't see anything relevant to the podcast except one hit. The article also reads like an advert. Beno1000 22:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Add the word podcast to your search and its the fist hit.

[2] This article shoudl not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thumper369 (talk • contribs)

• Comment Actually, the number of relavent GHits is the basis of notability. Not its position in the list. Beno1000 22:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• • So can we take off the deletion warning now? Thumper369

• • • No, community consensus must be reached first. And I am still standing by a delete vote because it is NOT notable. Beno1000 22:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable podcast. Googling "FirstTakePodcast" and "FirstTake"+"podcast" each give less than 30 unique hits. No assertion of notability in the article. -- Kicking222 23:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Beno1000 & Kicking222, non-notable podcast.--blue520 00:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable podcast. —ERcheck @ 03:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree I have seen the error of my ways. Actually, I understand things a lot better now. I am not able to post any form of notability as suggested. Thank you all for your time. Thumper369

Beno, can I suggest a little more compassion and help to new authors. I understand the need to help keep Wikipedia a good source of information. I could have come to the same conclusion about the state of my articles without the negative feedback. I don't see how your negativity helps build a community (see Talk:Mike_Teppenpaw). Give a listen to the next show when we talk about Xmen. We will be sure to include a little commentary about this experience near the end of the show.

• I have to agree. Beno, your comments on the page linked above borders on a personal attack imo. Let's be WP:CIVIL. -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 22:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.