Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firos Kunnamparambil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 22:43, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Firos Kunnamparambil[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bit of a technical special case. This one has been hanging out at the back of the NPP queue for a week, with every reviewer bypassing it. I believe part of the problem is that all the sources are in non-copyable form, thus they can't even be run through a translator. I'm going to stick my neck out and suggest that from what I can glean from translating the reference titles only, we are looking at a lack of sufficient independent, in-depth coverage to fulfill WP:NBIO. Any Malayalam-capable editors want to chime in? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:59, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:59, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~Fails WP:BLP1E as he's only know for being a social worker.~~ INeedSupport ^:3 03:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That, I think, is a misinterpretation of the guideline, which refers to "one single event" - you will see it coming up for subjects who are only known for participating in one reality TV show etc. Being notable for a single capacity or profession, OTOH, is entirely fine and very common. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it was a misinterpretation as I thought of a single event as a general thing. However, I still think the article should be deleted since the sources shows trivial coverage of the person. I did a quick translate (which is the only option I have when examining the sources) and I see that it talks about an issue and Kunnamparambil was interviewed, which does not meet WP:GNG. The award sources may show substantial coverage, but it's not enough to meet GNG. INeedSupport ^:3 21:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG.Now there are thousands of social activists now it not clear how the subject is notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.