Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fireworks (2000 TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Bhivuti45 (talk) 18:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fireworks (2000 TV series)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2015.

PROD removed because one of the other languages has citations, but looking at them they are either primary or mention the show in passing. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Korea. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found multiple reliable sources, albeit written in Korean, to support the keeping of this article. They're all in-depth (not passing mentions) and not routine coverage, as they cover the show in detail.

드라마 '불꽃', 뒤집기 성공할까 [Will the drama ‘Fireworks’ succeed in turning its fate around?] (Chosun Ilbo)

Dong-a Ilbo: [1], [2], [3] (this one is about an actor who played in Fireworks, but it has information about the show - also consult this article from the Maeil Business Newspaper)

A source from Maeil about its music

Joongang Ilbo: [4], [5] (this one is linked in the kowiki version, though there it's broken), [6]

There's more I didn't link, but I feel this is enough to support its notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wuju Daisuki (talk • contribs) 16:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not signing my comment, I was on mobile web and the site was acting real wonky. Today I expanded the article from a stub and (hopefully) made its notability apparent. Wuju Daisuki (talk) 01:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Wuju Daisuki's comment. toobigtokale (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Another review of the recently found sources would be helpful. Has the nominator looked them over?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw per sources listed above. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.