Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 06:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firefold[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any sources to demonstrate that the requirements of WP:CORP can be met. SmartSE (talk) 14:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP and lacks independent third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A local firm going about its business, but I am finding nothing that indicates encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 09:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.