Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firebrand chronicles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Firebrand chronicles[edit]
- Firebrand chronicles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unpublished book. Fails WP:BK. McWomble (talk) 12:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. The only web hits for it are for fan fiction. I very nearly speedy deleted it under either criteria A1 (insufficient context, since no author is indicated) or A7 (non-notable web content—while a future book publication is alleged, its only apparent current incarnation is on the web). —C.Fred (talk) 12:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, perhaps non-existant. Edward321 (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's starting to look like the creator of the article is the author. It's not quite self-promotional (yet), but it's certainly in the realm of things made up after school one day. —C.Fred (talk) 17:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not an outlet for fan-fiction. Jonny2x4 (talk) 14:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.