Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire camp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fire camp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zackmann08 (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator per WP:AFD I am placing this at the top of the page. I am new around here and learning the process. The consensus seems to be that I went about this the wrong way. My apologies. --Zackmann08 (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep As no reason to delete has been supplied. The page in question is obviously a rough start but, per WP:IMPERFECT, that's ok. There seem to be plenty of handbooks and histories in the search links above which can be used to develop the topic. Andrew (talk) 11:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - no rationale for deletion has been provided whatsoever. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:28, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Not only no rationale for deletion, but also no indication that nominator understands WP:BEFORE. A quick search finds WP:RS including Los Angeles Times, KHTS-AM, Long Beach Press-Telegram, and Idaho Mountain Express and Guide, among others, using the term "fire camp" with no dificulty.--Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Nomination withdrawn, somebody can close this now. Carrite (talk) 22:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.