Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire and Ice (wrestling)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Text available on request for any moves. Sandstein 05:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fire and Ice (wrestling)[edit]

Fire and Ice were a short lived team in WCW. The article can't be expanded much more, and doesn't serve much purpose. There is many wrestling articles like this, so this is just the start of teams nominations. Just because they have a team name doesn't make them more notable. RobJ1981 22:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Expand Somebdy just needs to be willing to put the effort in. TJ Spyke 22:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The team existed for only a few months, there isn't much to expand... unless the article becomes just a list of each match they had (which isn't how wrestling articles should be set up). RobJ1981 04:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I admit that the article wouldn't be big, but there is room to expand without adding in cruft like matches. TJ Spyke 05:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - A team around for only a few months can't be expanded. How hard is that to understand? The only way to expand the page is listing each and every match they were in. There is NOTHING else to add. A short lived team isn't that notable. This is an encyclopedia, not a guide to every short lived tag team that had an official team name. Put it on a wrestling wiki, not here. RobJ1981 19:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move to wrestling wiki While the team was notable in professional wrestling, they didn't accomplish anything, no championships and hardly any wins at all and are thus not notable enough for Wikipedia. semper fi — Moe 02:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree they were not around long enough to have an article as a team. I barely remember them as a tag team. Stephen Day 23:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.