Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Machines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fire Machines[edit]

Fire Machines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived local company and my multiple searches simply found nothing at all so although there may be some sources archived and at local news media, this is enough to show the company never got noticeable attention and, at best if necessary, this can be mentioned elsewhere such as Edina, Minnesota's article about this company but I'm not seeing much need. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No evidence of non-trivial coverage by reliable sources, the article fully admits one of its sources was basically a paid promotion, non-notable defunct company. Nsteffel (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.