Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingask Castle Subscription Mural

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fingask Castle. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fingask Castle Subscription Mural[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deleted via prod and restored at creator's request (WP:REFUND). My prod rationale was as follows: Appears to fail WP:N, as I'm unable to locate substantive treatment in reliable, independent sources. The first three references listed in the article cannot deal with this mural, since they predate its creation. Deor (talk) 02:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Fingask Castle. No evidence of notability in its own right, but no harm in mentioning it in the article on the castle. --Deskford (talk) 10:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Deskford (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I wrote the article and think it fine, but have merged it into Fingask Castle as this is better than nothing.Rodolph (talk) 11:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Fingask Castle. scope_creep (talk) 21:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.