Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finflation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Finflation[edit]
- Finflation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear notable. Searches via Google and Google Scholar primarily turn up mis-spellings of "inflation". Appears to be used as resume fodder for page author at http://www.nazar.info/ CRETOG8(t/c) 10:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no establishment of notability of independent coverage and/or usage of this coinage in reliable sources. Article sourcing currently consists of the coiner, Prof Nazar's, website and other wikipedia pages.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless author of term is notable and then a merge would be in order. But I don't think the guy has an article and he doesn't appear to be notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this neologism has no substantiated claim to notability, and the same goes for its author. Favonian (talk) 09:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. A search in Google Scholar or in IDEAS (search), the specialized search engine for scientific articles in economics, doesn't show anything either. CronopioFlotante (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete In economics there is a list of different types of "flations" that could be assembled on WP, but as a standalone item I say delete. It is a well-done article, but if WP wants notoriety as a prerequisite for entries, then you must delete this one.TheThomas (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.