Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finda.com.au

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finda.com.au[edit]

A series of websites with no independent notability. No evidence of independent sources asserting notability. The article is also promotional in nature. Mattinbgn\^talk 03:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article on my opinion was to describe a series of community sites useful for common users around Queensland regions which serve the community and where people interact, I don't find it promotional or with no interest as it is similar to presenting another website without any commercial interest. Benenuts 04:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 03:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There's no indication of notability, and it seems unlikely that his website would have been covered in sources other than the newspapers which are operating it (and hence aren't suitable sources for establishing notability). Nick-D (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with APN News & Media, the owner and operator of this series of websites. The *finda.com.au sites do not establish their own notability at this time. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 17:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The website does not satisy any of the criteria set out at Wikipedia:Notability (web). WWGB (talk) 06:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability and likely simply advertising. Orderinchaos 11:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per-comments made by WWGB and Orderinchaos. Bidgee (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.