Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Filmation. Sr 13 01:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filmations[edit]

Reads like an advertisement with not a neutral POV (i.e. "skeptics say this isn't Web2.0, but it is!" tone). Also, when this article was brand-new in September, a PROD was removed by an IP address user who added more spam. Questionable notability, or perhaps information about Filmation in general should be shrunk and merged to another article Guroadrunner 19:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or Redirect to Filmation, a notable American animation studio. I don't see this being talked about anywhere. This seems to be a neologism which is not being talked about by third parties. --Charlene 19:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect IANAL, but unless these guys bought the rights to the name, I see a trademark infringement case brewing. DarkAudit 23:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as adspam and redirect to Filmation. Ford MF 09:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advertisement, and no reliable sources. Possible merge/redirect with Filmation. *Cremepuff 222* 19:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.