Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fillerbunny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fillerbunny[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blablubbs recently PRODed this Article with the rationale "Article is completely unsourced and makes no indication of the subject's notability despite having been tagged since 2015. I can't see any indication of this meeting WP:BOOKCRIT and even if, the article would likely have to be almost entirely rewritten." I agree with this rationale, but the article had already been PRODed in MAY 2015. So I am sending it to AFD. Techie3 (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Techie3 (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my original rationale above. Thanks again for catching my mistake, Techie3. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.