Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filipinophile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Filipinophile[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural AFD; this was proposed for deletion with the rationale of The article is possible Original Research/synthesis of irrelevant facts/material: mere mentions of liking the culture's food somehow equate to being a "Filipinophile", Lea salonga, Manny pacquiao, Will Smith, appearances on Ellen degeneres etc have nothing to do with the topic. The word "Filipinophile" is not in any dictionary., but in light of how long the page has been live and the number of different people who've worked on it, there are obviously at least some people who consider this a viable topic so bringing it here for further input. Procedural nomination so I abstain. ‑ iridescent 07:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete - Neologism. A lot of people worked on it for sure. DangerDogWest (talk) 07:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, lack of RS, more self-publish sources than the reliable one. Google Books also showing a very low results. Furthermore, the Anti-Filipino sentiment article was more popular with reliable sources from Google Books (with Google Search showing an estimate of 21,900,000 results) than those favouring (only with 9,940 results). While Google News showing 0 results for "filipinophile" than 130 results for "anti filipino". ~ Muffin Wizard^;) 08:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 14:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 14:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 14:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:TNT, the article is just an account of foreigners giving some positive comments to Filipino cuisine, tourists destinations or certain internationally notable Filipino individuals. The "filipinophile" phenomena itself is not discussed much. May be a viable article under the title Pro-Filipino sentiment.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete based on the above reasons, this seems to be a synthesis. The article contains praise for specific Filipinos yet implies that the praise should be associated with the Filipino society as a whole. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to anti-Filipino sentiment or merge to pro-Filipino sentiment. Rtedb (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.