Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filamatic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 07:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Filamatic[edit]

Fails WP:COMPANY. Gives one secondary source, but not multiple ones. Only news sources are from press releases. Article borders on WP:ADVERT. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Small privately held company with little to no media coverage. LotLE×talk 04:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. JIP | Talk 06:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a consumer business, and most of the references given are to trade websites. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORP, should have been speedied. ukexpat (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I tried a CSD on it, but it was declined. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Oh yes I saw that. What I meant was that it should have been speedily deleted per your original nomination. – ukexpat (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 12:30, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.