Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fighting for G.O.D. (Gold, Oil, and Drugs)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fighting for G.O.D. (Gold, Oil, and Drugs)[edit]
- Fighting for G.O.D. (Gold, Oil, and Drugs) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Totally non-notable book. I see no way that it meets the guidelines under Wikipedia:Notability (books) Dipics 01:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Entirely non notable book. Nick mallory 02:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete All of the creator's edits are spam - to promote this book. Delte per WP:SPAM Corpx 03:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This book should be deleted for 2 reasons. First of all, the book is not notable enough. We do not need a article for every book out there. Secondly, because the creator of the article is probably try to advertise this book since he has a record of spamming.--†Sir James Paul† 06:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unable to find any reviews that are independent of the books authors or publishers. JulesH 17:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WorldCat search on ISBN returns "Sorry, no libraries with the specified item were found.", which is a quite dramatic failure of WP:BK criteria that all books need to "be available at a dozen or more libraries and be catalogued by its country of origin's official or de facto national library" as a bare minimum. DreamGuy 21:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also recommend deletion of the author created redirect to it. [1]. Edward321 04:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.