Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fielding Memorial Chapel of St. Mark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Thorneloe University. Sandstein 13:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fielding Memorial Chapel of St. Mark[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a small chapel, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing our notability criteria for buildings. This is referenced 5/6 to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, with just one hit of real coverage in real media shown -- and its strongest notability claims are being named to the city's municipal heritage buildings register, which isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of much more than just one GNG-worthy source, and that it won a regional architecture award sourced only to the awarding organization's own self-published content about itself, which is not how you establish that an award is notable enough to make its winners notable for winning it (that requires the award to be one that gets media coverage.)
All of which means that nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have a lot more than just one hit of media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect toMerge with the university; not separately notable. ETA: Agreeing with Peterkingiron. Keep the sources and summarize as a section in the university article. BBQboffin (talk) 22:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge a summary (rather than redirect) to the university. A university chapel (like most local churches) requires something special to make it notable. I see nothing special here. I do not undertand the relationships between Thornloe and Laurentian, but suspect there is a milling link in the article on the latter. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:18, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The only true reliable source is the CBC article. There needs to be more reliable, independent sources, however. Multi7001 (talk) 00:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.