Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Field Precision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spebi 10:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Field Precision

Field Precision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Field Precision LLC. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 18:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

• delete non-notable. Article describes services offered by company, not its history or achievements. RJC ^Talk 18:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No reliable sources establish notability. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:CORP. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 23:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Delete There aren't any notable sources. This is a clear delete. Ohmpandya (Talk) 01:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Dear Sirs:

This is our second attempt to introduce a page on Field Precision in Wikipedia. Our motivation was that all our competitors have pages that are linked from lists of FEA and CEA software companies within Wikipedia. We based the form and material of our entry on the page for Ansoft, which has been on Wikipedia for several years. Our intent was to keep the page as short as possible, emphasizing free resources for education.

We can certainly expand the page to include descriptions of the unique technical achievements of our company and the extensive applications by organizations around the world with links to publications. This would involve some effort and it would be disheartening if we were simply deleted at the end of the process. Would you please give us some guidance?

Sincerely, Stan Humphries —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.12.187 (talk) 14:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC) — 68.35.12.187 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Neutrality is an important objective at Wikipedia, Wikipedia is Not for Self-promotion, Advertising or advocacy of any kind. You appeasr to have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.--Hu12 (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.