Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feyenoord vs Lech 2008
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Feyenoord vs Lech 2008[edit]
- Feyenoord vs Lech 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No context for article, not in prose form. A single game is not notable itself. Nothing in the article indicates that this game is itself notable outside of being a game. Wikipedia is not merely a hold for sports stats. Shadowjams (talk) 10:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - while a single game certainly can be notable, there doesn't seem to be anything out-of-the-ordinary or otherwise noteworthy about this particular game -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is not a notable game. – PeeJay 11:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This almosts looks like a copyvio from some game database. Still, without any prose there's no indication why this particular game should be included. - Mgm|(talk) 11:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A single football game of top level (this looks like an international tournament, Champions' league or UEFA cup though the article doesn't say) is the kind of event which attracts a lot of media attention at the time and day after, but which is generally soon forgotten afterwards. Cannot see evidence of this game being all that memorable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I was unclear: certainly some games could be notable, but they're not notable because they're a game. They're notable because they are a big game with bigger consequences, events, viewership, etc. That doesn't have bearing here. Shadowjams (talk) 12:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - although single games can be notable, there is no indication as to why this particular one is. GiantSnowman 12:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is apparently someone's pet project about how their favorite team fared against teams from other nations, basically as stat table with flags. No indication about why this game would be more notable than any other. Mandsford (talk) 13:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Govvy (talk) 21:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An individual game can be notable - and we have plenty of precedent for this - but there's no assertion of particular notability for this one. --Dweller (talk) 12:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only the Final of the UEFA Cup would be notable (especially this year, since it's changing its name to the Europa League). This wasn't the Final. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) (talk) 10:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a single game, and the article does nothing to suggest that it should be kept. DeMoN2009 11:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.