Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fever (Bullet for My Valentine album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Wine Guy~Talk 09:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fever (Bullet for My Valentine album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreleased album. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Nouse4aname (talk) 19:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL Dlabtot (talk) 23:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: The article is already gaining coverage in the media, such as Rock Sound where I heard about it. No notability - or even existance - issues. --^{SteelersFanUK06} HereWeGo2010! 01:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: If notability is not proven now (which I'm pretty sure it can be), then it will be proved later. This is the third studio album from Bullet for My Valentine, a band with at least some mainstream success. This reminds me when the notability of For Lies I Sire, the most recent studio album of My Dying Bride (as of this post) was discussed before the album was released. The discussion is here if anyone wants to see it. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 02:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although I don't think this qualifies as speedy keep. This is an album by a very notable band, and it has a confirmed title and release date. Not only will it receive plenty of coverage by the time it is released, but it has also received some usable coverage already. There's already a paragraph or two, with sources, at Bullet for My Valentine, that cover the upcoming album. Another factor to consider is the fact that the album will be released in about two months, leaving a deletion somewhat in vain when the article will likely be recreated within weeks. The article is full of original research, but a bunch of sources from the band's article can be used here to expand the article a bit until the album's release. Tim meh 03:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep tracks and name sourced. The tracklist was leaked, but not on a WP:RS. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 15:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It should be kept because it is a notable bands upcoming album so if you do delete it you'll have to put it back up anyways.23:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nieper (talk • contribs)
Keep, plenty of third-party coverage establishing notability. Probably not enough in depth coverage to write a detailed article just yet, but it's okay for articles to start as stubs and expand as info becomes available. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP! Go to www.bulletformyvalentine.com, it's all over the main page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.165.26 (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Its got alot of notability as its an upcoming album. 74.207.182.243 (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.