Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festus Haggen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Festus Haggen[edit]

Festus Haggen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television character. While Gunsmoke was a very popular show, this individual character isn't himself notable. I'm not finding any third-party, non-trivial references that investigate this character or study him. AS such, he does'nt pass WP:GNG and the article should be deleted. Mikeblas (talk) 22:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. There's a "character biography" on the TV Land website, but that's not exactly cause for notability. Other than that, the only other real mentions were in Gunsmoke websites. The article is very in-universe and does not pass GNG. Johanna(talk to me!) 23:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and Redirect to Gunsmoke, where the character is already sufficiently covered. There's no sourced content to retain/merge. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and redirect, per the others. There is no evidence of notability here. Vanamonde (talk) 14:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.