Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival Leisure Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge into Basildon. KrakatoaKatie 13:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Festival Leisure Park[edit]

Contested speedy. Non notable business development. Not the first, not the biggest in the county, no notable features Nuttah68 20:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I hadn't encountered the term "leisure park" before I saw this article. I added some external links and references. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Leisure Park is part of the company's trading name, not a specific development type. Nuttah68 21:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. All it is a random collection of stores and such. JoshuaZ 02:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC) (note if better sourcing can be produced I won't object to a merger). JoshuaZ 16:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge It is not notable enough to constitute a whole article but I think it should be merged into Basildon, as it is a significant feature of the town, mentioned in local media (not always for advertising). I am happy to merge it. Ksbrown 15:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Basildon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theclodster (talk • contribs)
Merge with Basildon, since TT fixed it up some. --Shrieking Harpy ^Talk^|^Count 18:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.