Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando Wwirst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Anthony Appleyard (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando Wwirst[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fernando Wwirst doesn't exist. See here. There are numerous other forms of news coverage to demonstrate that fact. Even for a legitimate page, it's not clear that the joke itself, as a joke, would be notable enough for its own page. I don't think so since this is a flash-in-the-pan thing without encyclopedic worth. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The vast majority of the content on this page is not even about the subject, but is copied from the page for David Alaba. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - So much of the article's current material is wrong, merely being a copy of information related to David Alaba, but I'm wary to significantly mess with the page while it's in an active discussion. Still, it may be worth scrubbing the page so that it's only a lead paragraph at the moment since Alaba is a living person that shouldn't be subject to misleading information associating him with this prank. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Obviously fake article. I have tagged for CSD with a custom rationale as none of the available ones seemed proper. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 12:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.