Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernanda G. Weiden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Procedural keep due to information provided by User:Mujinga. If folks wish to renominate this article with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Missvain (talk) 03:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fernanda G. Weiden[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability, as a system administrator, the person is a free software user but not a developer. The page reads like the career summary on a CV. If Google and Facebook want to make prominent pages about their female employees on their own web sites and organizations in their sphere of influence then I feel it is commendable but not notable for Wikipedia. TransparencyDude (talk) 15:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - has significant coverage in reliable sources. The article was in a bad state, I've cleaned it up a bit and a BEFORE search would have revealed new sources such as Exame. Further there seems to be something fishy going on in that:
1/ the nominator has previously been warned last year for introducing defamatory content on the Free Software Foundation Europe article
2/ two days ago a blog post went up on the fsfellowship.eu website which is pretty much an attack on Fernanda Weiden and her wikipedia page (I won't link it here)
3/ the fsfellowship clearly has beef with the Free Software Foundation Europe, which Weiden is/was involved with
The beef may or may not be justifiable, but it's not in itself a good reason to campaign to get Fernanda G. Weiden's wikipedia page deleted. Mujinga (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This nomination has a strong whiff of bias even in the opening sentence where the nominator implies that developers (like me) are more notable than operators (like the subject). My German is quite weak, so I can't reliably evaluate many of the sources, but I'd support a procedural close. pburka (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.