Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenmore's Department Stores

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Young and the Restless. As there is no article on locations of this show already, I decided to give the show as merge target. I think a new article about such and similar locations may be a good idea though. So Why 14:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fenmore's Department Stores[edit]

No real world information, references, media coverage, no notability outside the show. If we delete the employees sections, nothing important stays to be merged somewhere. Magioladitis (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Significant fictional location for very major series's. The importance importance of these things does have some relation to the importance of the series. The list of employees serves to associate the characters--and such series do need such explanations to keep things moderately coherent. So that at least would need to be merged. DGG (talk) 19:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A google search gives almost nothing. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:53, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nothing, or alost nothing. If it gics only 2 usable refs, thats enough. DGG (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real world significance. Where is the independent coverage from reliable third party publications? We're not a host for original research, nor are we supposed to be a primary source of information. JBsupreme (talk) 06:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability not established through real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable Y&Rcruft. Nate • (chatter) 07:19, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge If notability isn't established independently, it means the article shouldn't stand on its own. But that doesn't mean it can't be merged somewhere like a list of Y&R locations. I don't see why the character list would need to be removed, it's a crucial part of the article (It's a way to group the people together). - Mgm|^(talk) 12:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the damn thing: Not independently notable. Schuym1 (talk) 20:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WP:CORP for a fictional TV show store? I guess it would meet it in real life. Nate • (chatter) 20:10, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I made a mistake. Schuym1 (talk) 20:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If no sources, may as well delete & create redirect. Merge to a section in the series (or better target) if there is anything sourced to merge. No proof of independant notability.Yobmod (talk) 11:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.