Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenmarel Mestarine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Elf deities. MBisanz ^talk 18:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fenmarel Mestarine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character fails to establish notability. Being included on a generic "Top X" list doesn't really help. TTN (talk) 00:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 00:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 03:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the Kotaku link helps, or merge to Elf deities. BOZ (talk) 05:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. The Kotaku link helps provide some evidence of notability for D&D deities more broadly, but it is not enough, alone, to demonstrate that this particular deity is notable. Josh Milburn (talk) 02:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 10:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per BOZ as I think the Kotaku link is sufficient; failing that, merge and redirect to Elf deities.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge - has one indep source but will be hard to find another I think so elf deities a feasible parent article. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Limited merge to Elf deities, is mostly a WP:NOTPLOT problem. Sandstein 07:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.