Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femmes fantastiques

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 11:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Femmes fantastiques[edit]

Femmes fantastiques (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have found a source about it [1], however I agree it is very unclear if it meets notability. Perhaps its best merge the article to the author's article. Homerethegreat (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment found no reviews in English, French or German. --Ouro (blah blah) 15:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I also found no reviews. The source found by Homerethegreat is the publisher's site, so not independent. The author does not have an article, so merge and/or redirect is not viable. Jfire (talk) 02:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.