Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminist Current

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Meghan Murphy. Content can be merged from history if the Meghan Murphy article is kept. Sandstein 08:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feminist Current[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website is not notable, it is a fringe site that has little to no coverage in the mainstream, thus this comes off as a POV page creation, and not an actually note worthy page on it's own grounds. Many web results of the 400 mentions in google news, aren't actually about the site, but happen to be picked up from people using the term "Feminist current" or even Feminist. Current" in unrelated context. ShimonChai (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're right that FC doesn't seem notable enough to stand on its own. Do the ties to Meghan Murphy justify keeping the article? Taylan (talk) 21:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taylan, It is typically merged into the notable article see: Jesse_Brown_(journalist)#Canadaland ShimonChai (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see, that makes sense, thank you. I'll work on merging the contents of the FC article with the Meghan Murphy article later. (Too late for me today.) I don't know how the technicalities of this works, but in any case I've saved the current source of the FC article to my computer (which wasn't much to begin with) so I can later merge it manually into the Meghan Murphy article, therefore feel free to delete it any time. Taylan (talk) 21:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mergewith Meghan Murphy. Murphy is the founder and editor of Feminist Current. Vexations (talk) 02:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Meghan Murphy. Not a lot to merge. AIRcorn (talk) 03:35, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a redirect is the wrong move. could put a line about it in murphy's text . Seafox289 (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reason? Seems like a likely search term. AIRcorn (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've now manually merged the contents into the Meghan Murphy article. (Maybe the website infobox should be deleted though.) A redirect to the section I've created within the Meghan Murphy article seems appropriate to me. Taylan (talk) 13:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a technical point but per WP:MAD, if Meghan Murphy is kept then there may need to be some work to keep attribution if this is deleted. If TaylanUB is the major author then it is probably alright and there are other ways to keep attribution and delete this. More just something to consider if this is closed as delete. AIRcorn (talk) 08:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Rab V (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is an AFD going on for the Meghan Murphy article and it seems likely that article will be deleted. I think delete is the right choice over merge or redirect in this situation. Rab V (talk) 19:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Might have spoken too soon as the tide has turned there. AIRcorn (talk) 08:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Meghan Murphy. Taylan (talk) 18:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.