Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicis Ventures

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Felicis Ventures[edit]

Felicis Ventures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. Coverage is routine business news. Fails WP:SIRS. UPE. scope_creepTalk 11:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and California. AllyD (talk) 12:45, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NCORP and WP:PROMO - sources lack WP:CORPDEPTH due to trivial coverage of capital transaction[s], such as raised capital, expansions, acquisitions, and hiring [...] of personnel, and sources, e.g. Forbes and Silicon Valley Business Journal, lack WP:ORGIND due to reliance on statements from people connected to the company for articles summarizing promotional announcements. An online search finds more overt press releases and trivial coverage. Also, Silicon Valley Business Journal is a product of American City Business Journals, which describes itself as offering "business leaders many avenues for making connections and gives them a competitive edge locally, regionally and nationally. ACBJ is the premier media solutions platform for companies that target business decision-makers", so appears to generally lack independence from the subjects of its coverage. Beccaynr (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.