Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felecia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bye. RL0919 (talk) 05:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Felecia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: none of the current references constitute significant coverage in external sources. I looked for new ones and found nothing useful. Porn industry awards no longer count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. Cheers, gnu 57 01:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 01:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 01:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 01:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 01:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Did a brief search and couldn't find anything to demonstrate notability. This is one of the cases where I wouldn't be surprised if sources exist to demonstrate notability given that half her career was in the pre-digital area and the generic stage name makes searching for sources extremely difficult. However, those sort of cases really need someone to actually have access to those sources when they write the article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only claim to notability was the now-superseded WP:PORNBIO SNG. Subject fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. The article lacks reliable source references, and searches for independent RS coverage yield only cast listings and other trivial mentions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.