Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felan Davidson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Felan Davidson[edit]

Non-notable (former?) radio personality. Sources do not mention the subject except for blog entries. No indication that this person is actually broadcasting on any radio station. It has been speedily deleted twice. Wperdue (talk) 23:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 23:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 23:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 23:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Felan Davidson's broadcast on BBC7 appears to have been one-off and not a regular occurrence as this article suggests, which makes me suspect the rest of the article has similar jumped-up claims. Can't find enough in Gnews to meet notability. If someone does demonstrate notability, this article needs completely re-writing, especially those gratuitous apostrophes, which should be outlawed under the Geneva Convention. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This story is not substatiated by its refs - there is a collection of self-published pages which claim importance, but the the third-party refs tell a different story (or, rather, no story at all). Couple that with the fact that the article creator has a history of introducing articles such as this (all since deleted; warnings issued) and that the article itself is a cut-and-paste copy of an autobiography, and it is becomes clear that the subject is nothing like as notable as the article would have us believe. I42 (talk) 19:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. The author seems to write repeatedly about the same few people, including herself. I suspect the others are her friends. Her articles are speedily deleted and then she makes them again and again. She has ignored warnings. I think a block is appropriate. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.