Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feel the burn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Feel the burn[edit]
- Feel the burn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Really a non-notable catch-phrase that fails WP:NEO. Although it gets used, there isn't much in the way of evidence from reliable sources about it's origin etc. The article has been a magnet for vandalism and WP:OR. Has been totally unsourced since 2005. Tagged as an orphan since 2006. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. — Rankiri (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dictionary definition. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per WP:NEO, esp. considering article is nothing more than a definition.—DMCer™ 17:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NEO and WP:NOTDIC. --BaronVonYiffington (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.