Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fedex Express Flight 1478

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. (non-admin closure) Pajeet 💩 00:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fedex Express Flight 1478[edit]

Fedex Express Flight 1478 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable aviation incident. Doesn't merit more than a aircraft/airport mention. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as copyvio from at least two pages at aviation-accidents.net and aviation-safety.net. Independent search yields a blip of mainstream media coverage when the accident happened. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete — Per above. Also entirely unsourced article on an unnotable event. The incident was described in an investigative report, but that is completely routine and not an indicator of notability.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.