Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feature (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 18:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feature (band)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable broken up band, Fails WP:BAND Polyamorph (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:58, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:58, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article has multiple reliable sources coverage such as Quitus, Clash magazine, The Skinny and Allmusic so passes WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sources seem a bit promotonal to me. 1 LP and a couple of EPs. I don't see how they satisfy WP:BAND. Polyamorph (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Significant coverage and all sources are reliable music press, agree that it passes WP:NMUSIC/WP:BAND/WP:GNG. All are reviews, apart from perhaps one which is a premiere, so don't agree that they are promotional, it's just favourable coverage. Lewishhh (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficient qualitative sources. Agree they are reliable and non-promotional, passes passes WP:NMUSIC. Yealdgate (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.