Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatina Salaheddine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fatina Salaheddine[edit]
- Fatina Salaheddine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like a self promotion page of a minor personality. Nothing notable and encyclopedic about it. --GeneralPatton (talk) 17:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC) GeneralPatton (talk) 17:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete, odd, some of the citations suggest there might be notabillity. But all are reprints in her own magazine, which is a bit peculiar and I think fails WP:RS as primary source (even though they shouldn't be). The one cite which isn't is just a list and proves nothing. Nothing in G-News or anything significant looking in google.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - while I disagree with ThePaintedOne's interpretation of the reprinted secondary sources, with a single exception in Arabic which I can't read they all are local news pieces. I don't think any number of local mentions will suffice to establish notability if no one outside her immediate community has taken note. Huon (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.