Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima I. Haruna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 23:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fatima I. Haruna[edit]

Fatima I. Haruna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Likely paid contribution by ghost editor who came out of nowhere to create seemingly flawless WP pages. Stood up on puff pieces; paid editorials. Simply not notable. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 15:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 15:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 15:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — No in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Furthermore yes! Just as Alexandermcnabb already stated in his Del rationale this is blatant UPE. Celestina007 (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.