Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima Fertilizer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fatima Fertilizer[edit]

Fatima Fertilizer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I just get a weird vibe from this article... Anyone else? There are parts of it that read like an advertisement to me. Not to mention the abhorrent grammar and structure. Skarz (talk) 07:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Article has too much headlines/subjects. The product lacks significance. --MrRatermat2 (talk) 13:53, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think it should be Speedy deleted per blatant advertising and partially copyright violations that are present since its first version. And I have tagged it as such. -- SMS Talk 19:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I reverted to a pre-copyvio version to allow for this discussion to continue. John Reaves 00:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have pruned it further leaving only two lines in the article as the version you restored also contained copyright violations. And since speedy deletion is declined so to comment on the notability of the topic it seems to be somewhat notable to me. I will be working on it to see if it can be improved. -- SMS Talk 20:34, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.