Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatih Sözen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fatih Sözen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has never played in a fully pro league. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 17:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep was topscorer in the Luxembourg top division. Eldumpo (talk) 11:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How does this make him notable? There is no guideline that states the top goalscorers are notable, and he stills fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. J Mo 101 (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Fatih Sözen[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as he fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.