Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatemeh TaghiNejad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete G5/g11 (non-admin closure) Praxidicae (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fatemeh TaghiNejad[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. ... discospinster _talk 01:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable in Persian or English.فرهنگ2016 (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment By searching google news, i found blank page (0 sources) [1] for which she fails WP:GNG. By seeing her career, found 0 roles/appearances i.e, fails WP:NACTOR. It would be deleted under A7 category, but for now lets wait for the decision. 77.243.187.60 (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fraud in the debate[edit]

IPs should not participate (Bypassing the law Wikipedia) Y Hotan1990 (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

anybody can participate in afds, indeed, there are a number of experienced editors who go by their ip address whose input to afds and elsewhere are especially welcome. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, have just reinstated the afd notice at the top of the article, it was removed by the article creator, the above editor (Hotan1990). Coolabahapple (talk) 08:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There also seems to be some socking going on to enhance this individual's film credits by adding unsourced information to related film articles. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. --SalmanZ (talk) 02:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet notabilty guidelines. IPs are people too, and can participate in any discussion they wish to. I still think we should require all editing to be done while signed in, but my views have not yet been adopted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G5 of a globally locked sock (Zahra_1369) and salt for good measure. Praxidicae (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.