Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi[edit]

Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find evidence to establish he meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No sources could be found in the article. NASCARfan0548  19:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, that much is obvious, unless anyone can provide better bibliographical information for the sources supplied. The question that needs to be answered here is whether anyone can find a source outside the article to confirm the claim of passing WP:NPOL . Phil Bridger (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the claim is that the subject was a member of the Jammu and Kashmir Praja Sabha (People's Assembly), elected in 1935. Additional help may be necessary to verify the claim. --Enos733 (talk) 22:36, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I previously put this up for PROD (reverted) because I couldn’t find anything when I searched in Urdu. Mccapra (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOL. No sign of holding any significant position. --KartikeyaS (talk) 06:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for lack of RIS. Mccapra (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.