Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast cars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, with several suggestions to consider renaming to an alternate title. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fast cars[edit]
This article seems unencyclopedic to me. It just talks about various cars that were the fastest in their respective eras. TomTheHand 15:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I find it encyclopedic. It shows the progress of cars techniques. Article could be improved (and written in a more encyclopedic manner). Merge to History of the automobile will create a to big article, so I vote to keep it. - Cate | Talk 15:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I agree that the article has merit. It might need a restructuring, but it should be kept around to allow that should someone see fit. --Falcorian (talk) 16:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This article is something of a magnet for linkspam. Richard W.M. Jones 17:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to Fastest production car or something similar. Much has been written about the topic and making a good article out of this wouldn't be too hard. To start with, the first paragraph could go into more detail about what its criteria are for whether something is "production" or not. Recury 17:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Needs some work, but definitely encyclopedic. A rename wouldn't be out of bounds. —Wrathchild (talk) 18:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Fast cars might look better in the shade, but the title is the only problem with this article. I'd suggest a few, but an auto-enthusiast must be able to come up with a better title. Agent 86 23:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename If we want to keep this information, the article needs to have a different, more encyclopedic name though I have no specific suggestions. --The Way 07:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Mergewith land speed record perhaps. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 19:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Iiyiyiah have a feeling that this belongs... I mean Keep per Agent 86. Danny Lilithborne 22:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep I'm tired of saying this yet once more, but list-like articles that people use and can maintain should be kept. Why should anyone else want to remove them? DGG 08:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.