Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashionography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fashionography[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable neologism. I can't find any reliable sources, the only mention seems to be a site/blog by the same name. It was also very likely created by the person the article claims coined the term. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can I delete thee? Let me count the ways: dicdef, promotional, neologism, lack of notability, potentially false text (the only other real ref was to an old Harper's Bazaar which used it in a completely different sense). Mangoe (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The term is used fleetingly in a few sources, but not finding coverage about the term itself. If sources turn up in this discussion to counter this notion, please notify me at my talk page. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.