Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farida Benyahia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Another being bold moment for me today - clearly passes WP:NPOL.

Thanks everyone for participating. Unhappy with this decision? If one wishes to renominate this article with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. I will not re-review my decision. Happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 23:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Farida Benyahia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, possible UPE Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NPOL as the president of Algeria's Conseil d'État. This appears to make her one of most important judges in Algeria, satisfying WP:NPOL#1. pburka (talk) 23:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 03:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NPOL, as pburka pointed out, she occupies one of the highest judicial offices in Algeria at the moment. Naushervan (talk) 06:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable, meets criteria for WP:NPOL Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly meets our inclusion criteria for government officials. The article may need editing because of NPOV issues, but the subject clearly meets notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly satisfies WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.