Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farid Fouzari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Farid Fouzari[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not seem to meet WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Subject never managed a professional team from 2012 onwards, and before 2012, they were an assistant manager, which does not confer notability for NFOOTBALL if they are assistant manager for a professional team. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 16:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - it's paywalled but this newspaper article may have some significant coverage. A lot of news articles have popped up that mention him since this AfD started, interestingly. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Potentially sources out there, no harm extending given minimal participation
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.