Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farhad Manjoo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Most participants agree that sufficient sources have been found to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca talk 23:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Farhad Manjoo[edit]
- Farhad Manjoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This BLP does not seem notable. The source for the guy being a "regular contributor" to NPR only has him appearing once. Unsure about this one, so I am bringing it to the community to decide. — Jake Wartenberg 23:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my prod. I don't believe that we generally have articles on magazine staffers unless they notable for some other reason, and a google search for Farhad Majoo does not reveal major anything besides what has already been placed in the article, which I do not see as enough for inclusion as a stand-alone BLP. Perhaps his novel, True enough: learning to live in a post-fact society is notable for inclusion though; in which case an article with half the sources from this article could be created.Instead of being deleted, the article would just be moved to a new title, I suppose.NW (Talk) 23:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Full list of NPR stories already listed in external links. Jokestress (talk) 02:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Evidently notable author and commentator. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to just meet the notability guidelines through discussion in Salon, NPR, etc; and there's really no pressing BLP issues as its well cited. ThemFromSpace 06:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball Keep can see why this was nominated but following improvements to article notability is well established. FeydHuxtable (talk) 17:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.