Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fanto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fanto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company owner is page creator, with WP:USERNAME and WP:COI/WP:PAID issues unaddressed. Not much evidence business meets WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Looks to be mostly WP:PROMO. JamesG5 (talk) 06:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. , probably sppeedy delete--it seems to be a vali A7 with no reasonable claims to significance. DGG ( talk ) 07:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blatant COI and advertisement. Deb (talk) 07:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are previous speedy deletions of articles on both Fanto and Fanto Fantasy Football. The current article does little more than confirm that the company is registered and operating. I don't see the DigitalSports interview piece about the founder's plans as enough to lift it beyond WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have replied to JamesG5. I am happy to be open and transparent and believe I have started discussion here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JamesG5#Fanto Hopefully, this covers all the topics which have been raised so far. Kind regards, James — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesPopeFanto (talk • contribs) 17:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Snow/speedy. Non-notable spam. Grayfell (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 16:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.