Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Life International (New Zealand)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Family Life International (New Zealand)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Gets a bunch of WP:GOOGLEHITS, but these seem to be an enormous number of press releases, passing mentions (eg. in lists), unreliable sources, and coincidental juxtapositions of words. Does not have the significant coverage in reliable sources needed to demonstrate notability under WP:GNG, WP:ORG, etc. Additionally, the article has almost no citations (and none to reliable sources) and is full of promotional language. The IP user removing the PROD notice did not address these concerns, saying that the information was factual and that it was sourced to their website - which is exactly the problem. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent sources, no indication of notability, and I've never heard of them. Daveosaurus (talk) 09:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm an avid follower of NZ news and like Daveosaurus, I can't say that I've ever heard of them, which would indicate that notability hasn't been met. Schwede 66 22:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obvious failure of WP:ORG. Cavarrone 05:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.