Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Court (Ireland)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Courts of the Republic of Ireland. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Family Court (Ireland)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Family Court (Ireland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. Could be merged.... somewhere... if sources are found. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Organizations, and Ireland. UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. While I haven't yet completed a full WP:BEFORE sources/notability check, at first glance (and as noted by the nom themselves), I'm not sure that outright deletion is likely to be an appropriate outcome here. (Perhaps a retitle, to cover family law in Ireland generally, including seemingly impending reform, which has received relatively significant coverage [1][2][3], might be in order). Otherwise, at the very least (and noting that Circuit Family Court already redirects to Circuit Court (Ireland)#Circuit Family Court), perhaps something similar could be done here. Which would also be consistent with some of the other members of the related DAB title... In the meantime at least. Guliolopez (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to Courts of the Republic of Ireland. This article on the fringes of notability would be better off as part of the proposed target, which currently is only at 1,346 words (see WP:SIZESPLIT). Per WP:CRYSTAL, this court has been going through its birth pangs for 50 years, and still seems to not exist yet as a distinct entity. StonyBrook babble 21:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per above. Additional discussion of the proposed merge target (or of course, of any other views) would be quite helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Merge as proposed. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.