Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/False reality bubble

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 00:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False reality bubble[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sort of a sexy catch-phrase. Is scarcely any used and certainly non-deserving of any standalone article.

I intensely wished for a redirect target but failed to find any. Efforts in that direction will be immensely appreciated:-)

I also question the motive of the creator, in light of this thread and the second sentence of the article, as it currently stands. ∯WBG^converse 15:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably Echo chamber (media). (Also, FWIW, divining motive is not a valid deletion rationale, and is at the very best needlessly distracting.) GMG ^talk 18:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
GreenMeansGo, thanks, for the target. Also, FWIW, you can probably expect that I have a fair knowledge of what a valid deletion rationale is.Furthermore, in light of the thread linked-to, I disagree that my comment is any divining, (though mileage may vary) and article creations on dubious grounds of likely POV-pushing is worthy enough to be mentioned over here.∯WBG^converse 19:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Take it or leave it however you like. Don't make any difference to me. GMG ^talk 19:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other possible redirects: Filter bubble (AKA Ideological bubble), Folie à deux (AKA shared psychosis), Shared delusional disorder (proposed merge with Folie à deux), and cult. StrayBolt (talk) 23:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In Talk:Echo chamber (media)#Split between Media and Ideological?, I proposed splitting the article based on "Media echo chamber deals with transmitting and seems tied to 24-hour news cycle, news vacuum, news as a business, press release journalism,…. Ideological echo chamber deals with receiving and seems tied to confirmation bias, filter bubble, Selective exposure theory, Blinders,…." and a third aspect, "For propaganda, which might appear like an echo chamber, it would include Party line, Manufacturing Consent, motd, Company Way,...." StrayBolt (talk) 23:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Filter bubble. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:57, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A phrase pulled from a quote in a single source. Doing a search of my own does not return sufficient coverage to merit WP:GNG. It's not clear to me that this is a term with a consistent meaning, and could be used to relate to a range of subjects. Given that, I'm advocating for deletion rather than redirecting. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rhododendrites. If it's a near coin-flip to choose where to redirect it to, redirection isn't the answer. Ifnord (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-It's a definite delete from me. Agree with Iford and Rhododendrites.∯WBG^converse 09:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Filter bubble, as per McClenon. --1l2l3k (talk) 20:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.